I did not argue "for several" hours, it was over the *span* of several hours. I probably didn't spend more than 10 minutes in that conversation.

As I said before, Perfect Works has errors, and Lacan is still Abel in a way, and you are pushing your interpretation as a fact on the wiki, the same thing you accuse ME of doing.

Even if you disagree that your interpretation is an interpretation, we can still come to a compromise. I already said we should be neutral and show both sides of the argument and let the reader decide, but you refuse to allow this because you are irreconcilable, moreso than I am.

Because of this, you're a complete hypocrite.

Community content is available under CC-BY-SA unless otherwise noted.